In a graduate seminar on Leibniz, diverse metaphysical views on the relationship between God and created beings were examined, focusing on Mere Conservationism, Occasionalism, and Concurrentism. The course highlighted how these theories reflect varying degrees of divine involvement and creaturely agency. Concurrentism, favored by Leibniz, presents a collaborative view of causal relationships, which offers a fertile ground for further philosophical exploration. The seminar encompassed pedagogical methods, drawing parallels between teaching styles and these metaphysical positions, thus enriching the learning experience and understanding of early modern philosophy.
In the presentation-oriented lesson (PL) method, a single student presents the assigned reading, likened to Mere Conservationism, where the instructor's role is limited and focuses on preservation.
Occasionalism, advocated by Malebranche, argues God is the sole causal agent while creatures function as 'occasional causes,' which raises significant dilemmas regarding the existence of evil.
Concurrentism, supported by Leibniz, promotes a cooperative relationship between God and created beings, balancing divine sovereignty with creaturely agency, fostering a dynamic realm for philosophical investigation.
The seminar analyzed the relationship between God and created beings through Mere Conservationism, Occasionalism, and Concurrentism, providing a structured exploration of early modern metaphysical thought.
Collection
[
|
...
]