Consciousness may be more than the brain's output - it may be an input, too

"As outside observers, we cannot directly access the conscious experiences of other beings. When we focus our third-person scientific tools on the places we suspect our mental lives to reside - namely, our brains (and bodies, more generally) - all we see is the stuff of physical reality: electrical activity, neurochemicals, and bodily tissues. No feelings, no emotions, no love."

"Modern science tends to see consciousness as arising from neural activity, like ghostly software conjured through the brain's material hardware. A radical new theory suggests something different: The brain doesn't only generate consciousness; rather, consciousness itself can influence the brain's physical dynamics - and it leaves physical traces when it does."

"The contents of our mental lives and the physical fabric of the reality we are immersed in appear to belong to two distinct domains. Since René Descartes first articulated the mind-body problem in the 17th century, Western thought has been haunted by the question of how these two seemingly incompatible aspects of reality interact."

Studying consciousness presents a fundamental scientific challenge analogous to observing a black hole's singularity from outside its event horizon. Direct observation of conscious experience remains impossible because subjective mental states cannot be accessed externally, only physical correlates like neural activity and neurochemicals are observable. Traditional science treats consciousness as an emergent property of brain hardware. However, a radical new theory challenges this view, proposing that consciousness not only arises from neural activity but can also influence the brain's physical dynamics and leave detectable physical traces. This perspective addresses the enduring mind-body problem that has troubled Western philosophy since Descartes, questioning how mental and physical domains interact.

Read at Big Think