The Supreme Court's ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023) emphasizes that derivative works compete commercially with originals, overshadowing artistic inspiration.
As a result of the recent Supreme Court decision, artists may find themselves restricted creatively, leading to a decrease in both quantity and quality of new art.
Most art is derivative in nature, and limiting artists' freedom can stifle innovation and diversity in the art community, particularly in places like Portland.
The impact of this ruling extends beyond copyright law into the realm of Artificial Intelligence, suggesting a shifting landscape for art creation.
Collection
[
|
...
]