Miro, while popular for its collaborative features, encounters issues such as board disarray, complexity for large teams, and performance problems that hinder effective collaboration.
For teams needing more flexible workflows and integrations, the alternatives tested offer better customization capabilities and price points, facilitating efficient project management.
The limitations of Miro become evident as boards grow, leading to confusing disorganization and frustrating usability issues that can stifle productivity in larger teams.
While Miro provides a free plan, restrictions on editable boards can be a significant drawback for teams that require extensive collaborative features.
Collection
[
|
...
]