The article emphasizes that great User Experience (UX) is not defined by flashy designs but by genuine empathy, clarity, and respect for users. It encourages designers to focus on functionality rather than aesthetics, stating that every interaction contains entry points for improvement. This means observing real user experiences and understanding their frustrations as opportunities for enhancement. Ultimately, good UX is achieved when designers truly care about how users feel and engage with the products they create, rather than leaning solely on popular heuristics or design degrees.
It's not about making things pretty. It's about making things work. Yes, aesthetics matter, but functionality always wins.
Every bit of friction in a product is an opportunity to make something better. UX is really about noticing.
True UX starts with empathy. Not the vague, corporate kind. I'm talking about real-world, user-observing, pain-point-mapping empathy.
You don't need to memorize every Nielsen heuristic to understand good UX. What you do need is to care about how people feel.
Collection
[
|
...
]