The article discusses a proposal to establish a Bitcoin reserve to counteract inflation impacts on the U.S. dollar, with proponents viewing it as legitimizing cryptocurrency. Sacks emphasized that the government will not sell Bitcoin, likening the reserve to a 'digital Fort Knox.' However, economists critique the plan as being based on unrealistic expectations about Bitcoin's value and the government's ability to manage the reserve without destabilizing the market. Concerns about conflicts of interest among lawmakers further complicate the proposal's reception.
"The U.S. will not sell any bitcoin deposited into the Reserve. It will be kept as a store of value. The Reserve is like a digital Fort Knox for the cryptocurrency often called 'digital gold.'"
"There is simply no good rationale for having a reserve that only consists of bitcoin the government possesses. It is less obnoxious than using tax dollars to purchase additional coins, but still costly."
"While the crypto sector celebrates newfound legitimacy, economists warn the plan relies on flawed assumptions about bitcoin price stability and potential market impact if sold back into dollars."
"Lawmakers deserve strong leaders who will prioritize the public interest ahead of their own bottom lines," wrote Elizabeth Warren, addressing concerns over conflicts of interest with investments linked to the proposed bitcoin reserve.
Collection
[
|
...
]