President Trump announced he is contemplating revoking the citizenship of Rosie O'Donnell, claiming she does not serve the country's best interests. O'Donnell, a U.S. native, moved to Ireland recently, prompting Trump to suggest she should remain there. This consideration contradicts a Supreme Court ruling from 1967, stating the government cannot take citizenship from native-born individuals. Legal experts underscore that voluntary renunciation is the only way to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Despite ongoing public disputes, O'Donnell's case differs from other citizenship revocation discussions, highlighting constitutional protections.
President Trump expressed he is pondering the revocation of Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship, citing her not being in the best interests of the country. He stated on social media that if she prefers Ireland, she should remain there.
Legally, the U.S. citizenship of individuals born in the U.S. cannot be revoked by the government, as established by a Supreme Court ruling in 1967. This ruling is underpinned by the Fourteenth Amendment, affirming the rights of native-born citizens.
O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship, rooted in her birth in America, is protected by constitutional rights against government revocation, contrasting significantly with cases like that of Elon Musk.
The U.S. State Department emphasizes that U.S. citizens may renounce their nationality voluntarily through specific actions, but the process requires a conscious decision to relinquish citizenship.
Collection
[
|
...
]