Recent legislation has sparked outrage as millions of citizens face hunger and health crises while lawmakers celebrate. The legislation's approval rate stands at only 29 percent, indicating a significant disconnect with public sentiment. Historical parallels are drawn to the Compromise of 1850, with a commentary on the moral implications of such legislative decisions. The perception of the law's authors and supporters, juxtaposed with the suffering of the poorest citizens, underscores a critique of their values and priorities in relation to the founding principles of the nation.
Millions of their fellow citizens will go hungry, and that millions of their fellow citizens will sicken and (likely) die, and that the United States will do nothing about the climate crisis.
The immortal catalogue of national crimes just got one entry fatter. Millions of our fellow American citizens will be deprived of life and liberty, and they will have to pursue happiness in ankle weights.
A bill with 29 percent public support, according to a Quinnipiac poll, just rearranged the entire country down to its poorest citizens.
There was cheering and laughter in the House chamber, and chants of USA, USA! as if this had anything to do with the United States of America as originally constituted.
Collection
[
|
...
]