"The assassination of Charlie Kirk should have been a moment of pause. However one felt about the brash conservative provocateur and free speech advocate, his killing was shocking and sobering. The instinct in a healthy civic culture would be to stop, to grieve, to allow space for shock before the machinery of politics whirred back to life. That instinct has all but vanished. Instead, Kirk's death became instant fodder for partisanship."
"Since Kirk's death, Trump swiftly folded the tragedy into his broader narrative of grievance, promising investigations into his political enemies. When asked about how he can fix the dangerously divided nation, he admitted that he couldn't care less if what he was about to say got him in trouble then followed by blaming the divide on the extreme left, while defending the extreme right for"
The assassination produced shock but was rapidly absorbed into partisan frames rather than a period of collective pause and grief. Media questioning about potential political consequences proved prescient as political leaders immediately leveraged the event to advance grievance narratives and promises of investigations. The former president integrated the killing into a broader story of persecution, blaming the left while defending the right. An attorney general publicly threatened prosecution for refusal to produce memorial materials, equating refusal with hate conduct. These reactions revealed tensions between conservative defenses of free speech and resistance to compelled speech, exposing hypocrisy and risk in the political climate.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]