The article discusses the role of federal judges in blocking Trump administration policies, portraying them as part of a corrupt system aimed at thwarting the president's agenda. It emphasizes the preemptive actions of judges, especially those appointed during Obama's presidency, in issuing injunctions and lawsuits against Trump's executive decisions. This so-called 'court case presidency' is highlighted as the Democrats' main strategy to counteract Trump's influence, with more than 160 cases currently ongoing, suggesting a significant reliance on judicial intervention in political matters.
It may not be brown paper bags changing hands, but this lawfare that defies the people's will is every bit as corrupt.
Democrats are rudderless, fighting each other and incapable of mounting an effective opposition. So they are depending on the federal courts to be the 'Last Bulwark Against Trump'.
According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, judges issued more than 14 injunctions against Trump's administration actions in February alone, with 160 'resistance' lawsuits winding their way through the system.
The courts have provided the only real opposition to Trump 2.0 so far.
Collection
[
|
...
]