The IRS's new interpretation permits pastors to endorse political candidates without jeopardizing their congregations' tax-exempt status. This interpretation clarifies that good faith communications between churches and their congregations do not constitute political campaign intervention as defined by the Johnson Amendment. While some religious leaders applaud the decision, others express worry about potential corruption, new pressures on clergy, and the implications of mixing religion with politics. The move follows pressures from conservative groups that argue the Johnson Amendment infringes on First Amendment rights.
A surprise move by the IRS allows pastors to back political candidates from the pulpit without losing tax-exempt status, praised by conservatives and some progressive groups.
The IRS stated that communications from a church to its congregation about faith matters do not violate the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted.
Concerns arise regarding potential campaign finance corruption and pressure on religious leaders, along with the entanglement of church and state.
Robert Jeffress, pastor of a Baptist megachurch and Trump ally, endorsed the IRS decision as the right choice for churches.
Collection
[
|
...
]