The second Trump administration is undertaking initiatives testing presidential power limits, echoing Trump's previous assertion about his Constitutional rights. The administration justifies these moves by arguing a popular mandate, despite erroneous claims of a landslide victory. The Office of Management and Budget's memo emphasizes aligning federal spending with presidential priorities, directing a significant portion of federal outlay towards enhancing U.S. strength and efficiency, while minimizing governmental wokeness. This exploration of presidential authority, paired with the current Supreme Court's role, raises significant questions about accountability and constitutional boundaries.
In Fiscal Year 2024, the nearly $10 trillion Federal Government spent over $3 trillion on financial assistance, guiding Federal spending towards Administration priorities.
Trump's claim of a mandate is fundamentally flawed, as his Electoral College win wasn't a landslide; such assertions misrepresent the actual election dynamics.
Collection
[
|
...
]