Justice Moulton expressed concerns about the "immense penalty" imposed, indicating that the size of the judgment against Trump is a significant point of contention and debate within the appellate proceedings.
Trump's attorney argued that the accusations of fraud regarding property valuations were "preposterous" and claimed that the judgment contravenes the statute of limitations, questioning the legality of the attorney general's approach.
Despite questioning both parties involved, the judges provided no clear indication of their ruling, reflecting the complexity of the case and the serious implications for Trump's financial future and legal strategy.
This civil fraud case not only imposes a hefty financial judgment against Trump but also intertwines with four ongoing criminal cases, reflecting the multifaceted legal battles he is currently facing.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]