The judge overseeing the election case against Trump will release a limited compilation of evidence but keep sensitive materials like grand jury transcripts and witness interviews redacted.
The ongoing dispute over the appendix highlights Trump's legal team's concerns about the impact of unsealing evidence on the upcoming presidential election and broader implications.
Smith's filed brief aims to clarify which evidence can be used against Trump following Supreme Court decisions on executive immunity, but does not reveal major new information.
If re-elected, Trump could potentially exert influence over the Justice Department to halt this ongoing case against him, showcasing the political dimensions of the legal proceedings.
Collection
[
|
...
]