How Google Spent 15 Years Creating a Culture of Concealment
Briefly

In a confidential memo from late 2008, Google executives stressed to employees that while information is valuable, casual comments and speculation could be detrimental in legal contexts. They urged caution in communication, particularly regarding 'hot topics', advising staff to think carefully and wait until all facts were known before speaking out. This set a precedent for a more cautious internal communication culture, focusing on legal protections.
As part of a broader strategy to mitigate legal exposure, Google configured its instant messaging tool to 'off the record', essentially ensuring that messages would disappear the next day. This technology tweak was part of Google's effort to foster a culture where internal comments could not be traced back to individuals, thus minimizing risks related to antitrust scrutiny and litigation.
The memo marked the beginning of a significant shift in Google's internal culture, as it initiated a 15-year campaign emphasizing information deletion as standard practice. Despite Google’s role in storing an immense volume of external data, internally the company worked to ensure less documentation and transparency among its employees, illustrating a fundamental distrust within the organization.
The culture of caution and distrust within Google evolved as a response to increasing scrutiny and legal challenges, leading to a restriction of communication among employees. This effort included leveraging various tools, such as claiming legal privilege to shield communications and promoting a mindset where employees were regularly warned about the dangers of uninhibited talk.
Read at San Jose Inside
[
|
]