At Google antitrust trial, documents say one thing. The tech giant's witnesses say different
Briefly

The Justice Department's antitrust case against Google hinges on whether the court believes the executives' emails or their in-court testimony, raising questions about credibility.
Google argues that the government is fixating on a narrow segment of online advertising and overlooks broad competition from various sectors such as social media and streaming.
Key government witnesses from Google, including product manager Jonathan Bellack, have tried to refute their previous written statements that seem unfavorable to the company.
Bellack's 2016 email highlighted concerns about Google's control over the entire advertising ecosystem, paralleling it to a financial monopoly, which strengthens the government's position against Google.
Read at The Seattle Times
[
|
]