At Google antitrust trial, documents say one thing. The tech giant's witnesses say different
Briefly

The Justice Department's antitrust case against Google unveils a struggle over the definition of monopolistic behavior, centering on Google's dominance in online advertising technology.
Bellack’s email raises concerns by likening Google’s control of the ad landscape to major banks owning the stock exchange, highlighting potential monopolistic implications.
Google argues that the government’s view is too narrow, asserting that they face competition from a wider online advertising landscape, including social media and streaming services.
Key witness statements often directly contradict their previous written communications, creating a challenging dilemma for the judge regarding the authenticity of their claims.
Read at SFGATE
[
]
[
|
]