Gelsinger's departure raises tough questions about why such a respected leader couldn't achieve the turnaround at Intel, signaling deeper issues within the company's culture.
Despite Gelsinger's credibility and vision, Intel's internal dynamics, characterized by bureaucratic bottlenecks and risk-averse decision-making, became a major roadblock to innovation.
Gelsinger’s exit isn't merely a leadership issue; it reflects a broader cultural stagnation at Intel that needs urgent addressing to avoid becoming obsolete.
Intel must confront its legacy dependencies and embrace transformative changes to remain relevant in a market increasingly dominated by competitors like Nvidia and TSMC.
Collection
[
|
...
]