"A jury was convinced that Meta's actions violated consumer protection law and engaged in practices both deceptive and unfair. Knowingly exploiting their users' lack of knowledge around platform safety was deemed unconscionable, and $US375m of civil penalties were imposed."
"In Los Angeles, a lawsuit was brought by a young woman against Meta (Instagram) and Google (YouTube), alleging these platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive, and the resulting addiction she experienced caused debilitating experiences of mental health harm, including depression, anxiety, dysmorphia and even suicidal ideation."
Two recent court rulings in the US have established legal accountability for tech companies regarding user harm. In New Mexico, Meta was found liable for misleading users about safety and enabling child exploitation, resulting in $375 million in penalties. Evidence included internal documents acknowledging risks. In Los Angeles, a lawsuit against Meta and Google claimed their platforms were designed to be addictive, leading to severe mental health issues for a young user, resulting in a $3 million compensation ruling. These cases mark a significant shift in legal responsibility for tech giants.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]