"In Louisiana v. Callais, the justices will rule on an incredibly important voting rights case about race and redistricting that conservatives hope will significantly undermine the Voting Rights Act."
"The Supreme Court cannot do justice to the Reconstruction Amendments without reckoning with the ways Black Americans shaped these transformational amendments and the principles of freedom, equality, and multiracial democracy they guarantee."
"When the Supreme Court discusses the text and history of the Reconstruction Amendments, it generally omits the critical role Black Americans played in their liberation struggle and the making-and meaning-of the Reconstruction Amendments."
The Supreme Court is set to rule on key cases regarding the Reconstruction Amendments, including voting rights and protections for transgender individuals. Cases like Louisiana v. Callais may undermine the Voting Rights Act, while Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. address equal protection for transgender women in sports. The court's interpretation often neglects the contributions of Black Americans to these amendments, focusing instead on the intentions of white lawmakers, which overlooks the struggle for freedom and equality that shaped these constitutional changes.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]