The ban on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) used to silence employees facing harassment and abuse signifies a crucial advancement stemming from the #MeToo movement. NDAs have historically protected trade secrets, but have increasingly been linked to concealing workplace misconduct. High-profile cases such as Harvey Weinstein and Philip Green brought significant attention to their misuse. Previous calls for reform and studies highlighted the regularity with which NDAs were employed to cover up allegations of discrimination and harassment, prompting a need for legislative action against their inappropriate use.
The ban on the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence employees subjected to harassment and abuse is a significant and long-awaited moment, one that has been talked about since the advent of the #MeToo movement.
Originally, NDAs were used to protect trade secrets, but they have become associated with silencing victims of harassment and abuse in the workplace.
Notable instances, such as those involving Harvey Weinstein and Philip Green, have highlighted how NDAs have been misused to cover up sexual harassment allegations.
A 2019 report by the Commons' women and equalities committee found that employers routinely used NDAs to conceal discrimination and harassment claims, urging a ban on their use.
Collection
[
|
...
]