'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching
Briefly

The retraction of a highly influential study underscores the ongoing difficulties in achieving reproducibility in scientific research, even among leading experts in the field.
One of the authors, Jonathan Schooler, acknowledges one of the journal's concerns but feels that it stems from an innocent oversight, as the team works on a new version of the manuscript.
Sam Schwarzkopf highlights that preregistration, a key aspect of open science, reveals the challenges researchers face; often, well-planned experiments do not yield expected results.
The journal retracted the paper due to lack of confidence in its findings, reflecting broader challenges within the scientific community regarding transparency and rigor.
Read at Nature
[
|
]