Solar geoengineering is advancing rapidly due to new funding, but the technology remains speculative and fears exist regarding lack of effective governance and potential dangers.
The academic community is sharply divided; while proponents advocate for geoengineering's potential benefits, critics warn about significant risks, including 'termination shock' and altered weather patterns.
Despite the ongoing polarization, funding for geoengineering research has surged, raising concerns that without proper governance, it may lead to unforeseen negative consequences.
Engagement between governance scholars, social scientists, and natural scientists is critical; however, the academic discourse has largely operated in silos, limiting comprehensive understanding.
Collection
[
|
...
]