The article discusses the distinction between 'complete' and 'complementary' dog foods, emphasizing the nutritional implications of each. Complete foods meet all nutrient requirements, while complementary ones do not. Pricing varies significantly, especially between wet and dry options. Daily cost comparisons of feeding a small dog reveal that while wet food is generally pricier, dry kibble can provide more affordable options, particularly non-vegan varieties. The article also notes the environmental impact of some premium foods, which may not necessarily lead to better nutrition.
Dog food labeled as 'complete' must provide all the necessary nutrients for pets, while 'complementary' products do not meet these requirements and can lead to deficiencies.
When comparing dog food costs, itâs essential to consider the daily feeding cost rather than just the price per kilo, as portion sizes vary by brand.
Wet dog food tends to be the most expensive option, while dry food, especially non-vegan options, often provides a more budget-friendly alternative.
The use of fresh ingredients in high-end dog foods can raise the carbon footprint due to transportation and storage needs, regardless of animal health claims.
Collection
[
|
...
]