The article discusses protests against the Trump administration's decision to withdraw federal funding from Harvard University, emphasizing claims of discrimination against Jewish, white, and Asian students. It argues that Harvard's behavior warrants a revocation of its tax-exempt status, citing historical Supreme Court rulings that seek to eliminate racial discrimination in education. The piece criticizes the IRS for ignoring ideological biases in academia while simultaneously framing the potential revocation of tax benefits as a necessary step toward moral accountability and legal compliance.
Your taxes and mine are being used to support tax-exempt elite universities that willfully break the law and discriminate against Jews, whites and Asians. It's a slap in the face.
This isn't about trying to make left-wing academia more balanced or less biased. Even though section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code bars tax-exempt organizations from engaging in 'propaganda' or favoring political candidates, the IRS has always turned a blind eye to campus leftism.
But calling on the IRS to stop subsidizing racial and religious discrimination is a moral imperative. And according to Supreme Court precedent, it's also the agency's legal duty.
Now Harvard is at a crossroads, facing scrutiny about its tax-exempt status in light of allegations that it has circumvented laws protecting against discrimination.
Collection
[
|
...
]