The article critiques the Senate's adversarial stance towards Tulsi Gabbard during her confirmation hearing for director of national intelligence. It discusses how Senate Democrats, particularly Mark Warner, condemned her past affiliations and comments, notably concerning Edward Snowden. This reflects a larger trend among Democrats increasingly aligning with the national security establishment since 2016, where oversight is seen as a threat to their agenda. Gabbard's past interactions with contentious figures like Assad also draw scrutiny, emphasizing the fractious nature of current political discourse around foreign policy and intelligence.
Tulsi Gabbard's nomination for director of national intelligence faced fierce opposition from Senate Democrats due to her past criticism of the intelligence community and meetings with controversial figures.
Mark Warner's criticism of Gabbard's past praise for Edward Snowden highlights the Democrats' growing allegiance to the permanent national security state post-Trump.
The disdain towards Gabbard stems from her reluctance to conform to the established narrative surrounding national security, reflecting broader tensions within the Democratic party.
The opposition showcases a broader political battle over national security that sees members of Congress prioritizing party alignment over scrutiny of intelligence operations.
Collection
[
|
...
]