Choosing to claim Social Security at 62 offers immediate income but results in permanently reduced monthly benefits compared with waiting until full retirement age or later. Early claiming may be driven by necessity for those out of the workforce, while working retirees face complex trade-offs affecting long-term financial security. The reduction in benefits can total thousands of dollars over a lifetime, making longevity, savings, and expected expenses essential considerations. Reviewing estimated benefits, assessing nest egg adequacy, and running detailed calculations are critical steps. Consulting a financial advisor can help balance short-term needs with long-term retirement security.
Deciding when to claim Social Security is one of the biggest choices retirees face, and many people gravitate toward age 62 simply because it's the earliest option available. For millions of Americans who find themselves out of the workforce by that age, claiming benefits right away is often less about strategy and more about necessity. But for those still working, the decision becomes more complex, involving trade-offs that can affect financial security for the rest of their lives.
Filing at 62 locks you into permanently reduced benefits compared to waiting until your full retirement age or beyond. While this provides income sooner, it can also mean giving up thousands of dollars over the course of your lifetime. The choice becomes even more challenging when you factor in savings, expected expenses, and how long you might live in retirement. These variables highlight why taking Social Security at the earliest opportunity may not always be the best financial move.
Collection
[
|
...
]