Companies like Amazon, AT&T, and UPS have mandated in-office work, claiming productivity losses during remote work. However, research suggests that remote teams can thrive with appropriate leadership. Instead of fostering effective communication, many managers resorted to surveillance tools, leading to negative employee sentiments without performance improvement. A UC San Diego and MIT study of remote workers revealed that constant monitoring led to decreased efficiency, particularly among low-performing employees. Improved outcomes stem from transparency and trust rather than intrusive oversight, indicating a need for better management practices in remote settings.
"Rather than taking courses on remote communication strategies, they embraced digital surveillance software that tracks mouse movement or times how long workers linger on a website. This approach failed to produce consistent gains in performance and often resulted in employees feeling resentful or anxious."
"It turns out that employees do not simply become more efficient because a manager watches their every move. Rather, they want clarity, communication, and trust."
"The results...are eye-opening. Among low-performing workers, those forced to stay under digital scrutiny with no explanation saw a 17 percent drop in their efficiency compared to those given clarity over the monitoring process."
Collection
[
|
...
]