A recent tribunal case highlighted the evolving expectations around remote work versus in-office attendance. The case involved IT director Ben Wicken, who requested to attend a critical mediation meeting via video call while supervising work on his home garden. Although his boss expressed disappointment, the tribunal determined that Wicken's decision to work from home did not display blameworthy behavior. This ruling indicates that remote attendance may be justified under certain personal circumstances, though it raises questions about communication and prioritization in the workplace.
The tribunal concluded that Wicken's decision to work from home was not blameworthy, suggesting that remote work may be acceptable under certain conditions.
During the hearing, Wicken's request to attend a key meeting via Teams due to supervising home renovations sparked discussions about workplace expectations and communication.
Collection
[
|
...
]