"Forgiveness, I learned, is less like flipping a switch and more like learning to sleep in a house where one room still has the lights on."
"Research from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology has shown that forgiveness is better understood as a motivational shift: a decrease in the desire to retaliate or withdraw from someone who caused harm. Notice what that definition doesn't include. It says nothing about the absence of anger."
"When we believe forgiveness requires emotional purity, we end up in a loop: we try to forgive, notice we're still angry, conclude we've failed, and then feel guilty on top of everything else. The guilt becomes its own wound."
Forgiveness operates differently than commonly believed. The traditional binary model—where anger and forgiveness cannot coexist—creates unnecessary suffering and guilt. Research demonstrates forgiveness functions as a motivational shift: a decreased desire to retaliate or withdraw from someone who caused harm. This definition notably excludes the requirement for emotional purity or complete absence of anger. Residual hurt and resentment can persist while genuine forgiveness occurs. When people expect forgiveness to eliminate all negative emotions, they enter a destructive cycle of attempting forgiveness, noticing lingering anger, concluding they've failed, and experiencing additional guilt. Understanding forgiveness as compatible with emotional complexity removes this self-imposed burden and allows for authentic healing.
Read at Silicon Canals
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]