Hamby's retaliation claim is insufficiently pled because Hamby offers no facts to establish the requisite 'but for' causation, and assertions that are merely 'consistent' with liability do not meet the necessary pleading standards.
The league's lawyers cite three 'independent reasons' they believe Hamby's case should be dismissed, including the argument that Hamby's claims under the Civil Rights Act for unlawful employment practices 'fail in their entirety because Hamby does not plausibly allege that the WNBA 'employed' her.'
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]