Despite bipartisan congressional support, some online speech advocates caution that the ruling sets a dangerous precedent. They argue, 'The government cannot shut down an entire communications platform unless it poses extremely serious and imminent harm,' highlighting the absence of such evidence in TikTok's case.
Gautam Hans from Cornell Law School suggests, 'Why would the Supreme Court take this case if they are already pretty deferential to national security? There's no mixed dissent, this was a bipartisan, congressional action,' pointing to the unlikeliness of a reversal.
Collection
[
|
...
]