Vivia Chen analyzes Skadden Arps's recent decision to commit $100 million to pro bono projects connected to the Trump administration, highlighting the disturbing implications for Biglaw's integrity and ethical standards. This preemptive capitulation sets a concerning precedent, as Skadden sought absolution despite not facing any immediate executive orders like Paul Weiss did. The firm’s massive financial commitment reflects an alarming trend of major law firms aligning with political powers, revealing how deep such firms will go to protect their reputations and secure favorable conditions under the current administration.
‘Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP approached President Trump and his Administration, and declared the Firm's strong commitment to ending the Weaponization of the Justice System and the Legal Profession.’
‘While it seemed jaw-dropping just 12 days ago or so that Paul Weiss agreed to put $40 million into Trump's pet pro bono projects, Skadden is committing a fat $100 million for the same privilege.’
Collection
[
|
...
]