#pro-bono

#pro-bono

Biglaw firms are prioritizing deals with Trump over essential pro bono services for public interest causes.

Biglaw firms underestimated backlash from pro bono commitments to the Trump administration.

Firms claimed their massive pro bono deals meant little in response to Congressional inquiries.

Skadden Arps negotiated a $100 million pro bono deal with Trump to avoid penalties from an Executive Order.

Willkie Farr’s commitment of $100 million in pro bono services reflects a strategic move to evade negative Executive Orders from Trump.

Milbank Law Firm has agreed to a deal with Trump that includes $100 million in pro bono services and a retreat from certain diversity initiatives.

Skadden's $100 million commitment to Trump marks a troubling precedent for Biglaw's compliance with political influence.

Brad S. Karp transitioned from opposing Trump to cooperating by pledging significant legal services in issues of mutual interest.

Peter Bruland's journey reflects the intersection of personal passion and high-stakes legal advocacy, emphasizing the importance of pro bono work.

Trump seeks to undermine law firms' pro bono practices that oppose his administration's policies.

Doug Emhoff's law firm agreed to a $100 million pro bono commitment to align with Trump administration policies.

Law firms aligning with Trump face consequences, signaling a troubling willingness to compromise their integrity for political favor.

Heritage Foundation pressures law firms for pro bono services, reflecting legal ethics versus political demands.

Milbank law firm agreed to provide $100 million in pro bono services to align with Trump's administration to avoid executive order repercussions.

Paul Weiss agreed to do pro bono work for Trump-related causes to avoid executive order repercussions.

Trump withdraws executive order against Paul Weiss after firm acknowledges wrongdoing and commits to $40 million in legal support.

Legal firms agree to $100m pro bono commitments to avoid harm from Trump’s executive orders, raising concerns over political intimidation in the legal field.