Nine major law firms made informal pro bono agreements reflecting support for the Trump administration but have faced a backlash and departures within their ranks. Internal memos state the firms will maintain independence in pro bono practices, despite the agreements potentially undermining that independence. Three months later, the firms have not shared how they plan to fulfill these commitments, leading to speculation about their future obligations, particularly regarding police brutality cases. The lack of public engagement signals a cautious approach by the firms and the administration.
Three months after making vague pro bono agreements with the Trump administration, nine major law firms are silent on their commitments, raising concerns about independence.
Following the controversial pro bono commitments, firms are facing firm departures, especially considering the potential obligation to defend police brutality cases.
Legal ethics expert Rebecca Roiphe remarks that neither the law firms nor the Trump administration is keen on escalating the situation, as it offers a win for Trump.
The agreements made by the law firms are termed informal by some; the lack of response regarding fulfilled commitments suggests an anticipatory breach.
Collection
[
|
...
]