Copyright infringement actions can sometimes be strategically deployed to silence critics, particularly when rightsholders misuse the law to intimidate individuals who seek to expose perceived injustices. The case of Zachary Parrish is emblematic of such misuse, where a concerned parent’s efforts to inform others about a religious education program were met with a lawsuit instead of dialogue.
Mr. Parrish's actions were in direct alignment with the doctrine of fair use, which allows individuals to engage in criticism and commentary about copyrighted materials. His motivation—to inform other parents about potential harms of LifeWise’s curriculum—highlights the broader importance of protected speech in fostering public awareness and understanding.
Collection
[
|
...
]