The suggestion to dismantle NOAA draws serious concerns from those who rely heavily on its weather and climate data, hinting at potential food price increases and broader economic impacts. This includes ranchers, farmers, as well as businesses that depend on reliable data for environmental conditions, crucial for planning and operational decisions. With such wide-reaching implications, the loss of NOAA could not only affect immediate agricultural markets but also have domino effects on the national food supply and prices.
The proposal to eliminate NOAA, as outlined in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the need for scientific data in managing natural resources. Thomas Gilman, a senior official from the last Trump administration, urges such dismantlement, yet fails to recognize the vital empirical information NOAA provides to communities across the nation. If put into action, this could dampen efforts crucial for environmental stewardship, thus posing risks to both local economies and ecological sustainability.
Collection
[
|
...
]