The article discusses the detrimental impact of Biglaw firms engaging in lucrative deals with Donald Trump on their pro bono commitments. Trump has gained a substantial financial advantage, raising concerns among public interest groups who struggle to partner with firms for civil rights and other crucial causes. While some firms, like Paul, Weiss, initially reconsidered their commitments to organizations like LULAC due to their investments with Trump, they ultimately chose to reaffirm their support. This ongoing tension highlights the precarious position of pro bono work in the current political climate.
"We cannot do this work without the support of the legal community and without the significant benefit of legal services that they provide."
"The sea has parted. There are some firms that are much more reserved about their engagement."
Collection
[
|
...
]