"Only 10% of voters are ready to buy a 17e outright and around half of that would join them if they like what they see in reviews. There is plenty to dislike on the iPhone 17e - even though it's the most basic model, it still costs $600. That gets you 256GB of storage to be fair, but having a chunky notch on the display (the 60Hz display no less) makes the phone feel cheaper than it actually is."
"The biggest issue facing the iPhone 17e right now is that for $200 more you can get an iPhone 17, which is better in every respect - now $200 is a lot of cash, but if you are already looking to pay $600, then paying $800 for the better phone doesn't feel out of reach."
"Having a single camera on the back and not even Apple's most capable wide camera is another downer. Some commenters say that this is a phone for grandma or for a young kid - other commenters counter that it's too expensive to give to a 12-year-old."
Poll results show the iPhone 17e occupies a niche market position with limited appeal. Thirty percent of voters have no interest in iPhones, while another 30% prefer premium models. Only 10% are ready to purchase the 17e immediately, with an additional 5% potentially interested after reviews. The device faces significant criticism despite offering 256GB storage at $600. Key drawbacks include a chunky notch, 60Hz display, and single rear camera that feels inadequate for the price. The iPhone 17e's primary challenge is value proposition: for just $200 more, buyers can access the superior iPhone 17, making the budget model less attractive to consumers already willing to spend $600.
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]