In an intense cross-examination, defense attorney Saam Zangeneh questioned San Francisco Police Sgt. Paul McIntosh about the crime scene dynamics, suggesting the location was not as isolated as prosecutors claimed. Zangeneh displayed surveillance footage to challenge the narrative, highlighting the presence of bystanders and vehicles during the incident. This tactic raised significant doubts regarding the prosecution's portrayal of the stabbing as a calculated, premeditated act, prompting the jury to reconsider the context of the crime.
During the trial, the jury was presented with conflicting interpretations of the events surrounding Bob Lee's death. Momeni's attorneys posited that their client acted in self-defense against Lee, who they described as 'drug-addled.' In this light, defense witnesses aimed to lessen the severity of Momeni's actions, framing the confrontation as a struggle rather than a deliberate attack. This defense underscores the complexity of the case, as both sides wrestle for the jury's perception of the truth.
Collection
[
|
...
]