The results revealed a significant cognitive bias: individuals tend to be overconfident in their opinions due to a perceived sufficiency of information, leading to flawed decision-making.
Participants who initially held a strong stance became open to new perspectives after being exposed to comprehensive arguments on both sides, illustrating the importance of complete information.
This phenomenon indicates a potential danger in today’s media: selective exposure can distort public perception by limiting the complexity of issues presented, affecting trust and judgment.
Gehlbach, Robinson, and Fletcher emphasized that better-informed individuals displayed greater humility in decision-making, relying on a fuller understanding of the situation rather than merely their initial impressions.
Collection
[
|
...
]