Abu Qamar stated, "For 16 years Gaza has been under blockade, and for the first time they are actively resisting, they are not on the defence, and this is truly a once-in-a-lifetime experience." This indicates her view on the significance of recent events in Gaza, which she interpreted as a shift in resistance rather than support for violence.
The tribunal found that the Home Office's decision reflected a "disproportionate interference with her protected right to free speech" under the European Convention on Human Rights. This emphasizes the legal protections around her expression.
Abu Qamar clarified, "I did not condone violence against civilians", asserting that her remarks were misinterpreted as support for Hamas. Her defense focuses on the distinction between supporting Palestinian resistance and endorsing violence.
Collection
[
|
...
]