Opinion | Born in the U.S.A. Doesn't Mean What It Used To
Briefly

The article discusses the concept of birthright, highlighting its historically exclusionary nature as a title of nobility or land ownership. In contrast, America's birthright citizenship, defined by the 14th Amendment, is fundamentally inclusive and rooted in equality. This perspective counters class division and oppression, emphasizing that citizenship is a shared right. The piece critiques recent efforts by the Trump administration to challenge birthright citizenship, noting state-level pushback and judicial hurdles that signify the unconstitutionality of such actions. Ultimately, it underscores birthright citizenship as essential to the legal and social fabric of America.
Historically, a birthright has been an exclusionary concept; in America, by contrast, birthright citizenship represents an encompassing notion meant for all, fostering equality.
The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment serves as a foundation for America's national character, indicating who is included in 'we the people' and reinforcing equality.
The Trump administration's attack on birthright citizenship challenges a core tenet of American identity, and multiple states have prepared legal actions against this order.
The enduring legitimacy of the Constitution is linked to the inclusive nature of birthright citizenship, fostering a pursuit of happiness free from class barriers.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]