The New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled that the interpretation of the state Civil Rights Act was unconstitutionally broad, impacting expressions that could unintentionally trespass.
The court stated, "Such a broad sweep discourages the expression of certain messages for fear of government sanctions under the Act based on the content of the messages expressed."
The attorney general's office expressed disappointment but emphasized their commitment to enforcing civil rights laws and protecting the community from hate-motivated threats.
A lawyer for the group stated their satisfaction with the court’s ruling, arguing that the attorney general’s interpretation lacked clarity on what constituted a violation.
Collection
[
|
...
]