Jeff Hancock stated, "I wrote and reviewed the substance of the declaration, and I stand firmly behind each of the claims made in it, all of which are supported by the most recent scholarly research in the field." This highlights Hancock's confidence in his expert opinion regarding AI's impact on misinformation despite the citation errors.
Hancock explained his approach, stating, "I used Google Scholar and GPT-4o to identify articles that were likely to be relevant to the declaration so that I could merge that which I knew already with new scholarship." This insight into his methodology reflects his attempt to leverage AI for thoroughness.
Addressing the errors, Hancock admitted, "I did not intend to mislead the Court or counsel ... and added incorrect authors to another citation," showing his recognition of the significant limitations of AI in generating reliable citations.
Despite the controversy, Hancock asserted, "the errors don't change the substantive points in the declaration," indicating that while the format may have flaws, the underlying arguments remain valid.
Collection
[
|
...
]