Following India's independence in 1947, a pivotal debate emerged regarding architectural materials, reflecting deeper philosophical divides between modernism and tradition. Mahatma Gandhi advocated for traditional craftsmanship, while Jawaharlal Nehru supported modernism, leading to a mosaic representation in today's Indian architecture. Colonial modernism, epitomized by stark geometric designs, was imposed as a representation of progress but marginalized traditional architectural narratives. Edwin Lutyens' planning of New Delhi highlighted this tension, as he integrated some Indian elements while fundamentally altering historical designs, silencing centuries of cultural significance integral to ornamentation and architectural expression.
The choice between brick and concrete for post-colonial India's architecture symbolizes a deeper philosophical divide between modernism and traditional craftsmanship, reflecting India's complex identity.
Colonial modernist architecture, represented by stark structures, was imposed as a 'civilizing' force, contrasting sharply with the rich ornamentation of traditional Indian buildings.
Mahatma Gandhi's advocacy for traditional craftsmanship starkly opposed Jawaharlal Nehru's embrace of modernism, highlighting a philosophical conflict in post-colonial architectural identity.
The rejection of ornamentation in modernist architecture ignored centuries of Indian cultural significance, curtailing the rich narrative of Indian art and craft.
Collection
[
|
...
]