During oral arguments, the judges focused on whether the FCC retains authority to enforce net neutrality rules post-recent Supreme Court decisions, amidst a changing legal landscape.
The major questions doctrine requires Congress to explicitly confer power on agencies for significant policy decisions, complicating the FCC's ability to implement net neutrality.
Jeffrey Wall, representing the broadband industry, argued that the FCC's actions represent a power grab beyond its authority under Title II, which only reinforces existing tensions.
The Supreme Court's recent rulings have considerably limited the regulatory power of the FCC, leaving the future of net neutrality hanging in a precarious balance.
Collection
[
|
...
]