Dr. Ennis argues that from 2008, Apple's commission of up to 30% on apps and in-app purchases constitutes an abuse of its dominant market position.
The CAT's certification of Dr. Ennis's claim marks a significant step for app developers, ensuring they have a collective voice against perceived abuse by Apple.
Apple's preliminary arguments aiming to dismiss Dr. Ennis's claim were unanimously rejected, affirming that the concerns of the app developers warranted a collective action.
Dr. Ennis's claim highlights that Apple's excessive charges are only viable due to its monopoly, which causes unfair harm to app developers.
Collection
[
|
...
]