Alito and Thomas Have Already Taken the Most-Contradictory Positions of the Supreme Court Term
Briefly

In Parents Protecting Our Children v. Eau Claire Area School District, Justices Alito and Thomas criticized the denial of standing based on speculative harm, urging courts to engage in contentious constitutional questions more openly.
During U.S. v. Skrmetti, Alito and Thomas displayed indifference to parental rights for Tennessee parents impacted by a gender-affirming care ban, contrasting their previous stance on parental authority.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]