5th Circuit rules ISP should have terminated Internet users accused of piracy
Briefly

The evidence at trial demonstrated that Grande had a simple measure available to it to prevent further damages to copyrighted works (i.e., terminating repeat infringing subscribers), but that Grande never took it.
Here, Plaintiffs [Universal, Warner, and Sony] proved at trial that Grande knew (or was willfully blind to) the identities of its infringing subscribers based on Rightscorp's notices, which informed Grande of specific IP addresses of subscribers engaging in infringing conduct.
Read at Ars Technica
[
|
]